Formulation
Development of Solid Dispersion Prepared by Newer Approach: A Research
Smita Kolhe1*, Dr.
Praveen Chaudhari2, Dhananjay More3
1P.E.S’s,
Modern College of Pharmacy (For Ladies), Moshi, Pune, Ms, India
2P.E.S’s,
Modern College of Pharmacy, Nigdi, Pune, Ms, India
3Emcure
Pharmaceuticals Limited, Bhosari, Pune,
Ms, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: smitamore92@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Hot melt extrusion is the most widely
applied technique of solubility enhancement, includes complex mixtures of API, plastisizers and polymer carriers which are passed through
single or twin-screw extruders at high temperature and stress. Present
investigation deals with enhancement of dissolution rate and hence solubility
of Lamotrigine, belonging to BCS class II, used
primarily for treatment of Epilepsy. Copovidone as
polymer and polyethylene glycol, polyoxy 35 castor
oil and sorbiton monolaurate
as plasticizers were used. Evaluation techniques like saturation solubility,
effect of temperature on preparation of complexes, differential scanning calorimetry, x-ray diffraction, Infra red, dissolution and
in vitro permeability studies were carried out. X-ray diffraction concluded
that hot melt extrusion process demolished the sharp peaks of lamotrigine indicating complete conversion of crystal form
to amorphous form. Dissolution and solubility studies showed enhancement in
release rate. Stability studies at 40 º C/75 % RH were studied, samples were
found to be stable even after 3 months study.
KEYWORDS: Melt extrusion, solubility,
glass transition temperature, plasticizers, BCS class II.
INTRODUCTION:
Lamictal[Lamotrigine(Lamo)], an antiepileptic Drugs (AED) of the phenyltriazine class, is chemically unrelated to existing
AEDs. Its chemical name is 3,5-diamino-6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-as-triazine
Biopharmaceutical classification
system (BCS), based on solubility and permeability of drug is divided into four
classes. .
Lamo shows low aqueous solubility
and high membrane permeability (class II) [1,
10] as per the BCS classification given below:
BCS class I BCS class II
High solubility Low Solubility
High permeability High permeability
BCS Class III BCS
Class IV
High solubility Low
solubility
Low permeability Low permeability
Increasing dissolution rate of
poorly water soluble drug is major challenge in dosage form development.
Bioavailability of orally administered drug mainly depends on its solubility
and permeability. Drug discovery shows that compounds are often high molecular
weight and highly lipophilic hence exhibits poor
solubility.
Dissolution of various drugs can
be improved by [11]
·
Increasing the surface area available for dissolution.
·
Optimizing wetting characteristics of compound surface.
·
Decreasing boundary layer thickness.
·
Ensuring sink conditions for dissolution.
·
Improve apparent solubility.
Various solubility enhancement
strategies in solid dispersion are fusion (melting), solvent evaporation, lyophilization (freeze drying), melt agglomeration process,
extruding method, spray drying technique, use of surfactant, electrostatic
spinning method and super critical fluid technology. One approach is formation
of solid dispersion of drug with hydrophilic excipients.
Ideal type of solid dispersion for increasing dissolution requires glass
solution in which amorphous drug has low thermodynamic barrier to dissolve
together with maximally reduced particle size. Also presence of hydrophilic excipients may lead to increase wetting leading to super
saturation in the diffusion layer.
Glass solution is formed when
two or more components are entirely miscible in molten state and cooled to form
amorphous one phase system. For glass solution, melt extrusion studies were
preferred due to several applications and advantages as given below:
Applications include: [12]
·
Improving dissolution rate and bioavailability of drug.
·
Controlling/modifying release of drug.
·
Masking bitter taste of drug.
Advantages include: [12]
·
Small equipment
·
Economic and continuous process and scale up flexibility
·
Solvent free manufacturing
·
High mixing efficiency
·
Closed process unit to prevent cross contamination
·
Short processing time
·
Easily controlled process parameters
·
Possibility of online analytics for process control
Disadvantage includes: [12]
·
Thermal process(drug/polymer stability)
·
Flow properties of polymers are essential to processing
·
Limited number of available polymers
·
Require high energy input
·
Melt technique process cannot be applied to heat sensitive
materials due to high temperature involved.
Hot
melt extrusion (HME) can be simply defined as the process of forming a new material (the
extrudate) by forcing it through an orifice or die
under controlled conditions, such as temperature, mixing, feed-rate and
pressure. [13]
A
variety of carrier systems have been studied or used in HME dosage forms. Such
carrier systems include polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or
its co-polymer such as polyvinylpyrrolidone-vinyl
acetate, copovidone (Kollidon
VA64), poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), various grades of polyethylene
glycols, cellulose ethers and acrylates, various
molecular weight of polyethylene oxides, poly methacrylate
derivatives and poloxamers. Amongst the different
classes of biodegradable polymers, the thermoplastic aliphatic poly (esters)
such as poly (lactide) (PLA), poly (glycolide) (PGA) and copolymer of lactide
and glycolide, poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) have been used in extrusion. Starch and
starch derivatives have been applied along with low molecular weight excipients like sugars and sugar alcohols and waxes.
Plasticizers are added to HME
formulations to facilitate the extrusion of the material and to increase the
flexibility of the extrudate. The choice of suitable
plasticizer depends on many factors, such as plasticizer-polymer compatibility
and plasticizer stability. Polyethylene glycol (PEG 4000), polyoxy
35 castor oil (Cremophor EL) and sorbiton
monolaurate (Montane 20
PHA), triacetin, citrate esters and low molecular
weight polyethylene glycols have been investigated as plasticizers in hot-melt
extruded systems. [14]
Basic requirements
for polymers used in HME:
|
Thermoplastic behaviour |
Deformability is essential |
|
Suitable Tg |
50-180°C |
|
High thermal stability |
50-180°C |
|
Low hygroscopicity |
Prevents crystallization |
|
No toxicity |
Application of large amounts possible |
|
High or no solubilization |
Thermodynamically stable capability formulation |
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Lamotrigine (Lamo)
was received as gift sample from Emcure
pharmaceuticals limited, Pune, India. Copovidone (Kollidon VA64), polyoxyl 35 castor oil (Cremophor
EL), PEG 4000, sorbiton monolaurate
and all other reagents and chemicals used were of analytical grade.
Methods:
1.
Characterisation of Lamo:
Lamo was characterized by following
test:
A.
Description:[1,4,6]
Lamo was studied for its color and
physical appearance.
B.
Saturation Solubility:[1,13]
Solubility of Lamo was measured in distilled water. An excess amount of
drug was added to 50 ml conical flask and was kept under shaking for 72 hrs
(Rotary shaker, Biomedica). Saturated solution was
filtered through 0.45 µ membrane filter, absorbance of filtered solutions was
determined and amount of drug solubilised was
calculated.
C.
Melting Point: [3,4]
Lamo melting point was determined by
both the capillary method and instrumental method. Capillary method was done by
taking capillary in which drug was inserted and then attached to thermometer.
Both capillary along with thermometer was inserted into the paraffin bath which
was heated and the melting temperature was recorded.
Instrumental
method involves insertion of capillary in the paraffin bath and the melting
temperature was recorded electronically (Melting point apparatus VEEGO). This
method proved to be more accurate than the former method.
D.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD):[13]
Lamo was subjected to XRD (P.W.
1729, X-ray generator, Philips, Nether land). To study XRD pattern, the drug
sample was placed into aluminum holder and the instrument was operated between
initial and final 2θ angle of 5-500 respectively in an
increment of 0.402θ.
E.
Infra Red (IR):[13]
Lamo, was subjected to Fourier
Transform Infra Red (FTIR 8400s spectrophotometer Shimadzu) studies to check
the characteristic sharp peaks of drug and its functional groups. The Pottasium bromide (KBr) disk
method was used for preparation of sample. The samples were ground gently with
anhydrous KBr and compressed to form pellet. The
scanning range was 400-4000cm-1.
F.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC):[13]
Lamo was subjected to DSC study
using (Mettler TA 4000) DSC apparatus. First 5-10 mg
of sample was weighed into aluminum crucible. This powder was analyzed by
heating at scanning rate of 100C / minute over a temperature range
50 to 200°C with nitrogen flow
of 50mL/min.
2.
Preparation of Calibration
Curve:[1, 13]
100µg/ml stock
solution of Lamo was prepared in 0.1N HCl by first dissolving 100mg of drug in 100mL of 0.1N HCl. Further 10ml of solution was withdrawn and diluted to
obtain solutions of 1, 2, 3,….10 µg/mL. Respective
absorbance values were measured at fixed λ max.
3.
Determination of Drug :Polymer
Ratio:[14,15]
Solubility of Lamo was checked in different solvents such as methanol,
ethanol and water. Both drug and polymer were soluble in ethanol and hence
selected for optimization of ratio. Drug and polymer (1:1 to 1:5) were solubilised in ethanol. The obtained solution was then
poured in petri plates and films were cast by solvent
evaporation method and were observed after 24 hrs at room temperature for their
appearance.
4.
Effect of Temperature on
Decomposition of Polymers:[14,15]
Polymer was
subjected to different temperatures at 120, 130, 140, 150 ºC, using heating mantle (Lab Hosp. Corp., ELCON)
and the molten polymer was cooled at room temperature and then milled using
hammer mill(Lab Hosp).The obtained granules of different processing temperature
were then compared for their appearance and discoloration .
5.
Preparation of Non HME (NL)
Formulation[As control sample]:
Lamo (as such), lactose monohydrate,
microcrystalline cellulose and crospovidone as in
table 1 are (sifted through #40 sieve) mixed well for 5 min. Prepared dry mix
lubricated by magnesium stearate (sifted through # 60
sieve) for 3 min. Lubricated granules were evaluated for flow properties and
compressed into tablets.
Table 1: NL FORMULATION
|
Ingredient |
Applications |
Quantity per tablet(mg) |
|
Lamo |
Drug |
200 |
|
Lactose monohydrate |
Diluent |
33 |
|
Microcrystalline Cellulose |
Diluent and binder |
33 |
|
Crospovidone |
Disintegrant |
8 |
|
Magnesium Stearate |
Lubricant |
1 |
|
Total |
|
275 |
6.
Effect of type and concentration
of plasticizer on solubility and dissolution:
Lamo, polymer and plasticizer as in
table 2 were mixed well and taken in porcelain dish. This dry mix was subjected
to melt at 217 ⁰C using heating mantle (Lab Hosp. Corp., ELCON) with mixing
to get clear molten mass. Curing of
molten mass was done by keeping it at room temperature for 12 hrs.
a.
Size Reduction of HME Flakes:
Solid dispersion
prepared by HME was then passed through 3mm screen of hammer mill, milled
granules were sifted through #40 sieve. Granules retained on #40 sieve then
passed through 1mm screen of hammer mill, milled granules were sifted through
#40 sieve. Obtained granules were mixed well for 5min.
b.
Lubrication of HME Granules:
HME granules were
then lubricated by sodium stearyl fumarate
and colloidal silicon dioxide (sifted through #60 sieve) for 5 min. Lubricated granules were evaluated for flow
properties and compressed into tablets. Compression parameters were recorded.
Table 2: HME FORMULATION
|
|
Applications |
L1 |
L2 |
L3 |
L 4 |
L 5 |
L 6 |
L 7 |
L 8 |
L9 |
|
Dry mix for HME |
|
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
mg/tab |
|
Lamo |
Drug |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
|
Kollidon VA64 |
Thermal binder |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
|
PEG 4000 |
Plasticizer |
10* |
- |
- |
20** |
30# |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Cremophor EL |
Plasticizer |
- |
10* |
- |
- |
- |
20** |
30# |
- |
- |
|
Montane 20 PHA |
Plasticizer |
- |
- |
10* |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20** |
30# |
|
HME Granules |
|
410 |
410 |
410 |
420 |
430 |
420 |
430 |
420 |
430 |
|
Lubricants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colloidal Silicon Dioxide |
Lubricant |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
|
Sodium Stearyl Fumarate |
Lubricant |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
|
Total |
|
414 |
414 |
414 |
424 |
434 |
424 |
434 |
424 |
434 |
*10% w/w of polymer (Kollidon VA 64); **20% w/w of polymer (Kollidon VA 64); #30% w/w of polymer (Kollidon VA 64)
c.
Characterization of HME Dry Mix
,HME Granules And NHME Dry Mix:
i.
DSC:
The drug, HME and
NHME were subjected to DSC study using (Mettler TA
4000) DSC apparatus. First 5-10 mg of sample was weighed into aluminum
crucible. These powders/granules were analyzed by heating at scanning rate of
100C / minute over a temperature range 50 to 2000 C with nitrogen flow of 50mL/min.
ii. XRD:
The drug, HME complex and NHME
formulated powder were subjected to XRD (using P.W. 1729, X-Ray Generator,
Philips, Nether land). To study XRD pattern, the sample was placed into
aluminum holder and the instrument was operated between initial and final
2θ angle of 5-500 respectively in an increment of 0.402θ.
iii.
IR:
The drug, HME complex and NHME formulated
powder were subjected to FTIR (8400s spectrophotometer Shimadzu) studies to
check the characteristic sharp peaks of drug and its functional groups. The KBr disk method was used for preparation of sample.
Prepared tablets
(table 2) of formulation F1 –F9 were subjected to solubility and dissolution
study.
7.
In Vitro Permeability of HME and
NHME Formulation:
The prepared
tablets were subjected to In vitro permeability test using dialysis membrane
LA401.
8.
Stability Studies:[13,16]
Stability studies
of tablets were performed as per International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. The tablets from the
optimized batch were subjected for stability study at 40ºC/75% RH for 3 months.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
1.
Characterisation of Lamo:
A.
Description:
B.
It is a white, odorless crystalline powder. Hence confirms the
description as per the certificate of analysis (COA).
C. Saturation Solubility:
As per literature the solubility
of Lamo in water is less than 380µg/mL. Experimentally it was found to be 3.703952381µg/mL.
D.
Melting point:
Melting point by
capillary method and instrumental method observed was 214⁰C and 217⁰C
respectively. (as per the literature 217ºC)
E.
XRD:
Sharp peaks were
observed from 5 to 30º of 2θ scale, which reveals the crystalline nature
of drug.
F.
IR:
IR spectra reveal
characteristic functional groups same as reference standard.
G.
DSC:
DSC studies show
the peak value at 217⁰C corresponds to standard
melting point (217ºC).
All the
characteristic test of pure drug confirms the purity of Lamo.
2.
Preparation of Standard Curve:
Lamo is soluble in dilute HCl
2mL, so this medium was used for preparation of standard curve. λ max,
correlation coefficient R and calibration curve equation are as given below.
Using absorbance and concentration data Beer
lamberts plot was prepared which is shown in figure 1 and table 3. Calibration
curve equation has shown linear relationship and high degree of correlation in
the range of 1-10 μg/mL
at 288nm. This curve was utilized in Lamo estimation
as and when required.
Table 3: CALIBRATION CURVE FOR LAMO (n=3)
|
Concentration (µg/mL) |
Average Absorbance |
|
1 |
0.0545±0.07 |
|
2 |
0.0889±0.19 |
|
3 |
0.1258±0.04 |
|
4 |
0.1558±0.03 |
|
5 |
0.189±0..22 |
|
6 |
0.2262±0.14 |
|
7 |
0.2579±0.59 |
|
8 |
0.2913±0.28 |
|
9 |
0.3289±0.16 |
|
10 |
0.3613±0.66 |
Figure 1: CALIBRATION CURVE FOR
LAMO
3.
Determination of Drug :Polymer
Ratio
Initially all the
prepared films were transparent as in table 4. Appearance of these films even
after storage at room temperature for 24hrs remained transparent except film of
pure drug which on storage shows the recrystallization
of drug. In all other ratios of drug: polymer (1:1 to 1:5). Lamo
remain in solubilised state throughout the storage
period as in figure 2. So 1:1 ratio was selected for further study as Lamo remains in solubilised state
in this ratio.
Table 4:
OPTIMISATION OF DRUG: POLYMER RATIO
|
|
Sample |
Solvent |
Ratio |
Solubility |
Appearence |
Appearance after 24 hrs |
|
A |
Drug |
Ethanol |
- |
Clear
solution |
Clear,
transparent |
White
clusters were seen |
|
B |
Polymer |
Ethanol |
- |
Clear
solution |
Clear,
transparent |
Clear,
transparent |
|
C |
Drug:
Polymer(1:1) |
Ethanol |
1:1 |
Clear
solution |
Clear,
transparent |
Clear,
transparent |
|
D |
Drug:
Polymer(1:2) |
Ethanol |
1:2 |
Clear
solution |
Clear,
transparent |
Clear,
transparent |
|
E |
Drug:
Polymer(1:3) |
Ethanol |
1:3 |
Clear
solution |
Clear,
transparent |
Clear,
transparent |
|
F |
Drug:Polymer(1:4) |
Ethanol |
1:4 |
Clear
solution |
Clear,
transparent |
Clear,
transparent |
|
G |
Drug:Polymer(1:5) |
Ethanol |
1:5 |
Clear
solution |
Clear,
transparent |
Clear,
transparent |
Figure 2: APPEARANCE OF FILMS AFTER 24 hrs (AT ROOM TEMPERATURE AND IN DESICATOR), A: PURE DRUG, B: POLYMER, C: DRUG: POLYMER
(1:1), D: DRUG: POLYMER (1:2), E:DRUG:
POLYMER (1:3), F: DRUG: POLYMER (1:4),
G: DRUG: POLYMER (1:5)
Figure 3: TEMPERATURE RANGE FOR EXTRUSION
OF PURE POLYMERS
Table 5:
EVALUATION OF LUBRICATED GRANULES AND TABLETS (n=3) ND
|
Parameters for
granules |
Observations |
|
Bulk Density(g/mL) |
0.55±0.022 |
|
Tapped
density(g/mL) |
0.64±0.012 |
|
Hausner’s Ratio |
1.16±0.01 |
|
Carr’s Index (%) |
14.06±0.07 |
|
Angle of repose
(⁰ ) |
25±0.034 |
|
Parameters for
tablets |
Observations |
|
Machine |
Lab Hosp |
|
Punch |
19 x 9.5,Capsule shape |
|
Weight of
tablet(mg) |
210±0.011 |
|
Hardness(kg) |
12-15±0.061 |
|
Disintegration
Time(mins) |
8±0.51 |
|
Friability (%) |
0.3±0.801 |
4.
Effect of Temperature on
Decomposition of Polymer
Extrudates of Kollidon
VA64 look clear and glassy, with increasing temperature the colour
turns yellowish and brownish. The actual discolouration
of polymer was observed above 120⁰C
processing temperature. Above 200⁰C
melting temperature extrusion becomes difficult.
5.
Preparation of Non HME
Formulation
Lubricated
granules characterization and compression parameters are as given below in
table 5.
Table 6: EVALUATION OF LUBRICATED GRANULES AND TABLETS (n=3) HME
|
Parameters for granules |
Observations |
||
|
|
L1 |
L2 |
L3 |
|
Bulk Density(g/mL) |
0.52±0.15 |
0.512±0.11 |
0.501±0.033 |
|
Tapped density(g/mL) |
0.67±0.04 |
0.64±0.001 |
0.63±0.019 |
|
Hausner’s Ratio |
1.28±0.11 |
1.25±0.04 |
1.26±0.064 |
|
Carr’s Index (%) |
22.38±0.021 |
20±0.061 |
20.48±0.27 |
|
Angle of repose(⁰) |
27±0.01 |
26±0.023 |
28±0.022 |
|
Parameters for tablets |
L1 |
L2 |
L3 |
|
Machine |
Lab.
Hosp. |
||
|
Punch |
19 x
9.5,Capsule shape |
||
|
Weight of tablet(mg) |
mg |
mg |
1264
mg |
|
Hardness(kg) |
12-15
kg±0.06 |
12-15
kg±0.09 |
12-15
kg±0.01 |
|
DT(min) |
24mins±0.01 |
25mins±0.036 |
23mins±0.088 |
|
Friability(%) |
0.3%±0.01 |
0.31%±0.08 |
0.36%±0.037 |
Figure 4I: DSC OF A) PURE DRUG B) NHME C) HME PEG D) HME CHREMOPHOR E) HME MONTANE 20 PHA
6.
Effect of type and concentration
of plasticizer on solubility and dissolution:
Glass transition
temperature (Tg) (figure 3) of Kollidon
VA64 is 101⁰C, which may be reduced after
addition of plastisizers. As a general rule, melt
extrusion process should be run at temperature 20-40⁰C above the Tg. Temperature range for melt extrusion
of pure polymer is 155-200⁰C
where as for polymer plastisizer combination it is
120-200⁰C.
In melt extrusion process drug
can be either dissolved or dispersed in an amorphous or crystalline state. To obtain
thermodynamically stable formulation drug must get completely dissolved below
its saturation solubility in the polymer which is known as solid solution .When
the main objective of melt extrusion technology is enhancement of solubility,
the processing temperature should be equivalent or slightly higher than melting
point of drug to get solid solution system. Melting point of Lamo is approximately 217⁰C (by DSC method), so the 200⁰C temperature was selected for melt extrusion processing to
get solid solution.
a.
Size Reduction and
b.
Lubrication of Granules
c. As compared to NHME granules,
dense granules were obtained by HME process. Increased bulk and tapped density
values confirmed the presence of dense granules. Hausner’s
ratio, carr’s index and angle of repose values
reveals the good flow characteristics of granules (table 6). Disintegration
time of tablets prepared by HME technology was three times higher than those
prepared by NHME technology (table 6). Disintegration pattern was bursting and
erosion in tablets prepared by NHME and HME technology respectively.
c. Characterization of HME Dry
Mix ,HME Granules And NHME Dry Mix
Absence of sharp
peak was observed in DSC of HME granules as compared to DSC of pure drug. This
indicates the presence of amorphous drug in molten carrier, but in case of NHME
the sharp peak was observed indicating the crystalline nature of drug. DSC thermograms of Lamo in NHME and Lamo HME granules represented in the figure 4I. The DSC thermograms of pure Lamo shows
sharp endotherm at 2170C attributed to the melting of Lamo.
This sharp melting endotherm indicates the
crystalline nature of drug. The DSC thermogram of
NHME shows melting at 217 and 1810C of the drug and polymer
respectively. The DSC thermogram of HME PEG, HME Chremophor and HME Montane 20PHA
shows absence of characteristic melting endotherm of Lamo indicating the perfect miscibility of drug and polymer
in the solid dispersion. As single Tg is
characteristic of the thermoplastic system, the DSC thermogram
of solid dispersion shows complete amorphization of
drug.
The XRD pattern of pure drug,
NHME, HME PEG, HME Chremophor and HME Montane PHA were recorded between 0-5°2θ scale and
represented in the following figure 4II. The XRD pattern of pure drug shows
several diffraction peaks indicating the crystalline nature of the drug. Peaks
for crystallinity were observed in pure drug (Figure
No. 4II a). The XRD pattern of NHME showed the presence of peaks with a
significant decrease in intensity or absence of some major dap crystalline
peaks (Figure No. 4II c). Generally this partial loss of crystallinity
may be observed due to physical presence of amorphous excipients
and their higher concentration. The drug was still in the crystalline state in
this system. The XRD patterns of HME PEG, HME Sorbiton
and HME montane 20 PHA showed complete absence of
peaks of crystallinity as observed in pure Lamo indicated complete amorphization
of Lamo in the melt. The presence of hump in all the
samples indicates the amorphous nature of drug in the HME granules (Figure 4II
c, d, e).
From the FTIR study Figure 4III
it is clear that there is no interaction between drug PEG, drug chremophor, drug montane 20 PHA.
All the peaks were responsible for active functional groups which were even
present in HME granules of different types. In NHME similar peaks were observed
as that of pure drug indicating no complex formation between drug and polymer
7.
Dissolution and saturation
solubility
The disintegration
time of tablets prepared by HME process was three times more than DT of NHME
formulations. Comparatively, the Lamo HME tablet
prepared by using 10%w/w concentration of montane 20
PHA shows more similarity than other formulations (Figure 5I).
Saturation
solubility data (table 7) indicates that the hot melt process improved the
solubility of Lamo by 4 times, 25 times and 74 times
of its original solubility by using PEG 4000, Cremophor
EL and Montane 20 PHA respectively. As compared to
encouraging results of saturation solubility, dissolution data didn’t showed
any noticeable discrimination in different plasticizers. So, it was decided to do the further study
by using 20% w/w and 30%w/w concentrations of plasticizers. Increased
concentration of plasticizers didn’t show any noticeable improvement in
saturation solubility. A discriminative method to determine the dissolution
enhancement by HME technique the in vitro permeability of formulations
containing 10% plasticizer (using dialysis membrane in disso apparatus) was
performed.
Figure 4II: XRD OF A) PURE DRUG B) NHME C)
HME PEG D) HME CHREMOPHOR E) HME MONTANE 20 PHA
Figure 4III: FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED OF
A) PURE DRUG B) NHME C) HME PEG D) HME CHREMOPHOR E) HME MONTANE PHA
Figure 5I: DISSOLUTION STUDIES OF VARIOUS
FORMULATIONS WITH
Table 7: SATURATION SOLUBILITY OF
FORMULATION (WITH 10% PLASTICIZER) IN WATER (n=3)
|
Solubility Plasticizer concentration |
Pure Drug (µg/mL) |
Drug in 10%w/w aq. solution of polymer (µg/mL) |
Drug in Non HME Dry Mix (µg/mL) |
Drug in HME granule with PEG 4000 (µg/ml) |
Drug in HME granule with Chremophor EL
(µg/mL) |
Drug in HME granule with Montane 20PHA
(µg/mL) |
|
10% |
7.15± 0.11 |
13.2± 0.14 |
10.09± 0.88 |
37.91± 0.30 |
31.66± 0.11 |
64.60± 0.02 |
|
20% |
7.15± 0.13 |
13.2± 0.11 |
10.09± 0.75 |
39.41± 0.03 |
32.35± 0.73 |
67.06± 0.06 |
|
30% |
7.15± 0.14 |
13.2± 0.55 |
10.09± 0.69 |
40± 0.11 |
34.71± 0.37 |
68.24± 0.05 |
Figure 6: PERMEABILTIY STUDIES
Table 8: STABILITY STUDIES (FORMULATIONS CONTAINING 10%
PLASTICIZER) (n=3)
|
Formulation |
L1 |
L2 |
L3 |
|||||||||
|
Storage Condition |
400±20C/75%±5%RH |
|||||||||||
|
Storage Period |
Initial |
1M |
2M |
3M |
Initial |
1M |
2M |
3M |
Initial |
1M |
2M |
3M |
|
Physical Appearance |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
|
Moisture Content (%) |
1.2± 0.12 |
1.3± 0.55 |
1.3± 0.33 |
1.3± 0.06 |
1.5± 0.02 |
2.0± 0.75 |
2.2± 0.05 |
2.8± 0.03 |
2.8± 0.31 |
2.9± 0.51 |
3.6± 0.024 |
3.7± 0.24 |
|
Drug Content (%) |
99.2± 0.06 |
99.11± 0.01 |
98.97± 0.07 |
98.7± 0.017 |
99.00± 0.08 |
98.88± 0.28 |
98.12± 0.33 |
97.11± 0.85 |
98.2± 0.85 |
98.01± 0.50 |
97.99 ± 0.32 |
97.12± 0.64 |
|
Dissolution (%) at 180min |
95.02± 0.22 |
94.11± 0.89 |
93.93± 0.36 |
93.2± 0.09 |
93.57± 0.21 |
93.10± 0.01 |
92.90± 0.85 |
91.81± 0.36 |
94.17± 0.28 |
93.88± 0.01 |
93.2± 0.85 |
92.01± 0.92 |
8.
In vitro permeability of HME and
NHME formulation
In vitro permeability
study shows (Figure 6) that the Lamo HME tablets
prepared by 10% Montane have highest permeability as
compared to other Lamo HME tablets. NHME tablets
shows lowest in vitro permeability compared to all Lamo
HME formulations, even though have higher dissolution rate. Increase in, in
vitro solubility and permeability may increase the in vivo solubility and
permeability which leads to reduction in some fold of Lamo
dose and cost of dosage form.
9. Stability Study
Stability study
(table 8) was carried out to determine the physical stability of the
formulation carried out as per ICH guidelines at 400 C and 75 % RH
for 1, 2 and 3 months. Various tests such as the drug content, moisture content
and dissolution were carried out at the
end of 1, 2 and 3 months and compared with the day 0 results.
CONCLUSION:
Solubility of Lamo can be increased by HME technology which is one of the
method of solid dispersion. The XRD pattern shows amorphous nature of Lamo in HME granules. The DSC thermogram
of HME granules shows absence of characteristic melting endotherm
of Lamo indicating the perfect miscibility of drug
and polymer in the HME granules. Dissolution rate of Lamo
HME tablets is not similar to that of NHME and marketed formulations, but the
saturation solubility and in vitro permeability of Lamo
HME formulations is higher than NHME and marketed formulations. In all HME
formulations HME with Montane 20 PHA shows better
enhancement in, in vitro permeability and saturation solubility. All optimized
HME formulations shows good stability over the period of 3 month at 40 ±
20C/ 75%±5%RH.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors are thankful to Emcure Pharma Ltd, Modern College
of Pharmacy (For Ladies), Moshi and University of Pune for their support.
REFERENCES:
1.
Lamotrigine, 84057-84-1CAS MSDS, Product Description.
http://google.com
2.
Lamotrigine, drug bank, db00555, Lamotrigine.
http:// google.com
3.
open notebook science,lamotrigine, http://google.com
4.
Lindenberg M, Kopp S, Dressman
J. Classification of orally administered drugs on the World Health Organsation Model list of Essential Medicines according to
the biopharmaceutical classification system. Europen
Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 58;
2004: 265-278.
5.
Patel R, Dr Natvarlal M. Formulation
Strategies for improving drug solubility using solid dispersions. Pharmaceutical
Technology. 7(6); 2009.
6.
Patel PS, Raval JP, Patel HV. Review on
Pharmaceutical Applications of Hot Melt Exturder.
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 3(2); 2010.
7. Gavin PJ, David S, Osama AM,
Daniel NM, Mark S. Hot Melt Extrusion: An Emerging Drug Delivery Technology.
Pharmaceutical Technology Europe. 21(1);
2009:24-27.
8. Leuner C, Dressman J. Improving drug solubility for oral delivery
using solid solutions. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 5; 2000: 47-60.
9. Ford JL. The current status of solid
dispersions. Pharm. Acta Helv. 61; 1986:
69-88.
10. Goldberg AH, Gibaldi
M and Kanig JL. Increasing dissolution rates and
gastrointestinal absorption of drugs via solid solutions and eutectic mixtures
III Experimental evaluation of griseofulvin-succinic
acid solution. J. Pharm. Sci. 55;
1966: 487-492.
11. Doherty C, York PJ. Evidence for
solid-and liquid-state interactions in a furosemide polyvinylpyrrolidone solid dispersion. Pharm. Sci. 76; 1987: 731-737.
12. Sekiguchi K, Obi N. Studies on absorption
of eutectic mixtures. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 9; 1961: 866- 872.
13. Nozawa Y, Mizumoto
T, Higashide F. Improving dissolution rate of
practically insoluble drug kitasamycin by forcibly
roll mixing with additives. Pharm.
Ind. 8; 1986: 967-969.
14.
Hancok BC, Shamblin SL,
Zografi G. Molecular mobility of amorphous
pharmaceutical solids below their glass transition temperatures. Pharm. Res.12; 1995: 799-806.
15.
Yang M, Li J, Kathrin RJ, Gryczke A, Asgarzadeh F. A Systematic and predictive Approach for
Formulation Development of Poorly Souble Drugs via
Solid Dispersion, Evonik Degussa Corp, Pharma Polymers, USA
16.
K. Kolter, M. Karl, S. Nalawade, N. Rottmann, Hot-Melt
Extrusion with BASF Pharma Polymers Extrusion
Compendium, BASF The Chemical Company, October 2010.
17. Suneela Prodduturi,
Kevin L. Urman, Joshua U. Otaigbe
and Michael A.Repka, Stabilisation
of Hot-Melt Extrusion Formulations Containing Solid Solutions Using Polymer
Blends, AAPS PharmSciTech. 8(2); 2007: E1-E10.
Received on 31.10.2013 Accepted on 01.12.2013
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian
J. Pharm. Res. 3(4): Oct. - Dec.2013; Page 172-180