Formulation Development of Solid Dispersion Prepared by Newer Approach: A Research

 

Smita Kolhe1*, Dr. Praveen Chaudhari2, Dhananjay More3

1P.E.S’s, Modern College of Pharmacy (For Ladies), Moshi, Pune, Ms, India

2P.E.S’s, Modern College of Pharmacy, Nigdi, Pune, Ms, India

3Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited, Bhosari, Pune, Ms, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: smitamore92@gmail.com

 

 

ABSTRACT:

Hot melt extrusion is the most widely applied technique of solubility enhancement, includes complex mixtures of API, plastisizers and polymer carriers which are passed through single or twin-screw extruders at high temperature and stress. Present investigation deals with enhancement of dissolution rate and hence solubility of Lamotrigine, belonging to BCS class II, used primarily for treatment of Epilepsy. Copovidone as polymer and polyethylene glycol, polyoxy 35 castor oil and sorbiton monolaurate as plasticizers were used. Evaluation techniques like saturation solubility, effect of temperature on preparation of complexes, differential scanning calorimetry, x-ray diffraction, Infra red, dissolution and in vitro permeability studies were carried out. X-ray diffraction concluded that hot melt extrusion process demolished the sharp peaks of lamotrigine indicating complete conversion of crystal form to amorphous form. Dissolution and solubility studies showed enhancement in release rate. Stability studies at 40 º C/75 % RH were studied, samples were found to be stable even after 3 months study.

 

KEYWORDS: Melt extrusion, solubility, glass transition temperature, plasticizers, BCS class II.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Lamictal[Lamotrigine(Lamo)], an antiepileptic Drugs (AED) of the phenyltriazine class, is chemically unrelated to existing AEDs. Its chemical name is 3,5-diamino-6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-as-triazine

 

Biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS), based on solubility and permeability of drug is divided into four classes. .

 

Lamo shows low aqueous solubility and high membrane permeability (class II) [1, 10] as per the BCS classification given below:

BCS class I                   BCS class II

High solubility              Low Solubility

High permeability        High permeability

BCS Class III               BCS Class IV

High solubility              Low solubility

Low permeability        Low permeability

 

Increasing dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drug is major challenge in dosage form development. Bioavailability of orally administered drug mainly depends on its solubility and permeability. Drug discovery shows that compounds are often high molecular weight and highly lipophilic hence exhibits poor solubility.

 

Dissolution of various drugs can be improved by [11]

·        Increasing the surface area available for dissolution.

·        Optimizing wetting characteristics of compound surface.

·        Decreasing boundary layer thickness.

·        Ensuring sink conditions for dissolution.

·        Improve apparent solubility.

 

Various solubility enhancement strategies in solid dispersion are fusion (melting), solvent evaporation, lyophilization (freeze drying), melt agglomeration process, extruding method, spray drying technique, use of surfactant, electrostatic spinning method and super critical fluid technology. One approach is formation of solid dispersion of drug with hydrophilic excipients. Ideal type of solid dispersion for increasing dissolution requires glass solution in which amorphous drug has low thermodynamic barrier to dissolve together with maximally reduced particle size. Also presence of hydrophilic excipients may lead to increase wetting leading to super saturation in the diffusion layer.

 

Glass solution is formed when two or more components are entirely miscible in molten state and cooled to form amorphous one phase system. For glass solution, melt extrusion studies were preferred due to several applications and advantages as given below:

Applications include: [12]

·        Improving dissolution rate and bioavailability of drug.

·        Controlling/modifying release of drug.

·        Masking bitter taste of drug.

 

Advantages include: [12]

·        Small equipment

·        Economic and continuous process and scale up flexibility

·        Solvent free manufacturing

·        High mixing efficiency

·        Closed process unit to prevent cross contamination

·        Short processing time

·        Easily controlled process parameters

·        Possibility of online analytics for process control

 

Disadvantage includes: [12]

·        Thermal process(drug/polymer stability)

·        Flow properties of polymers are essential to processing

·        Limited number of available polymers

·        Require high energy input

·        Melt technique process cannot be applied to heat sensitive materials due to high temperature involved.

 

Hot melt extrusion (HME) can be simply defined as the process of forming a new material (the extrudate) by forcing it through an orifice or die under controlled conditions, such as temperature, mixing, feed-rate and pressure. [13]

 

A variety of carrier systems have been studied or used in HME dosage forms. Such carrier systems include polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or its co-polymer such as polyvinylpyrrolidone-vinyl acetate, copovidone (Kollidon VA64), poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate), various grades of polyethylene glycols, cellulose ethers and acrylates, various molecular weight of polyethylene oxides, poly methacrylate derivatives and poloxamers. Amongst the different classes of biodegradable polymers, the thermoplastic aliphatic poly (esters) such as poly (lactide) (PLA), poly (glycolide) (PGA) and copolymer of lactide and glycolide, poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) have been used in extrusion. Starch and starch derivatives have been applied along with low molecular weight excipients like sugars and sugar alcohols and waxes.

 

Plasticizers are added to HME formulations to facilitate the extrusion of the material and to increase the flexibility of the extrudate. The choice of suitable plasticizer depends on many factors, such as plasticizer-polymer compatibility and plasticizer stability. Polyethylene glycol (PEG 4000), polyoxy 35 castor oil (Cremophor EL) and sorbiton monolaurate (Montane 20 PHA), triacetin, citrate esters and low molecular weight polyethylene glycols have been investigated as plasticizers in hot-melt extruded systems. [14]

 

Basic requirements for polymers used in HME:

Thermoplastic behaviour

Deformability is essential

Suitable Tg

50-180°C

High thermal stability

50-180°C

Low hygroscopicity

Prevents crystallization

No toxicity

Application of large amounts possible

High or no solubilization

Thermodynamically stable capability formulation

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Lamotrigine (Lamo) was received as gift sample from Emcure pharmaceuticals limited, Pune, India. Copovidone (Kollidon VA64), polyoxyl 35 castor oil (Cremophor EL), PEG 4000, sorbiton monolaurate and all other reagents and chemicals used were of analytical grade.

 

Methods:

1.      Characterisation of Lamo:

Lamo was characterized by following test:

A.     Description:[1,4,6]

Lamo was studied for its color and physical appearance.

B.     Saturation Solubility:[1,13]

Solubility of Lamo was measured in distilled water. An excess amount of drug was added to 50 ml conical flask and was kept under shaking for 72 hrs (Rotary shaker, Biomedica). Saturated solution was filtered through 0.45 µ membrane filter, absorbance of filtered solutions was determined and amount of drug solubilised was calculated.

C.     Melting Point: [3,4]

Lamo melting point was determined by both the capillary method and instrumental method. Capillary method was done by taking capillary in which drug was inserted and then attached to thermometer. Both capillary along with thermometer was inserted into the paraffin bath which was heated and the melting temperature was recorded.

Instrumental method involves insertion of capillary in the paraffin bath and the melting temperature was recorded electronically (Melting point apparatus VEEGO). This method proved to be more accurate than the former method.

D.     X-ray Diffraction (XRD):[13]

Lamo was subjected to XRD (P.W. 1729, X-ray generator, Philips, Nether land). To study XRD pattern, the drug sample was placed into aluminum holder and the instrument was operated between initial and final 2θ angle of 5-500 respectively in an increment of 0.402θ.

E.     Infra Red (IR):[13]

Lamo, was subjected to Fourier Transform Infra Red (FTIR 8400s spectrophotometer Shimadzu) studies to check the characteristic sharp peaks of drug and its functional groups. The Pottasium bromide (KBr) disk method was used for preparation of sample. The samples were ground gently with anhydrous KBr and compressed to form pellet. The scanning range was 400-4000cm-1.

F.      Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC):[13]

Lamo was subjected to DSC study using (Mettler TA 4000) DSC apparatus. First 5-10 mg of sample was weighed into aluminum crucible. This powder was analyzed by heating at scanning rate of 100C / minute over a temperature range 50 to 200°C with nitrogen flow of 50mL/min.

2.      Preparation of Calibration Curve:[1, 13]

100µg/ml stock solution of Lamo was prepared in 0.1N HCl by first dissolving 100mg of drug in 100mL of 0.1N HCl. Further 10ml of solution was withdrawn and diluted to obtain solutions of 1, 2, 3,….10 µg/mL. Respective absorbance values were measured at fixed λ max.

3.      Determination of Drug :Polymer Ratio:[14,15]

Solubility of Lamo was checked in different solvents such as methanol, ethanol and water. Both drug and polymer were soluble in ethanol and hence selected for optimization of ratio. Drug and polymer (1:1 to 1:5) were solubilised in ethanol. The obtained solution was then poured in petri plates and films were cast by solvent evaporation method and were observed after 24 hrs at room temperature for their appearance.

4.      Effect of Temperature on Decomposition of Polymers:[14,15]

Polymer was subjected to different temperatures at 120, 130, 140, 150 ºC,  using heating mantle (Lab Hosp. Corp., ELCON) and the molten polymer was cooled at room temperature and then milled using hammer mill(Lab Hosp).The obtained granules of different processing temperature were then compared for their appearance and discoloration .

5.      Preparation of Non HME (NL) Formulation[As control sample]:

Lamo (as such), lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose and crospovidone as in table 1 are (sifted through #40 sieve) mixed well for 5 min. Prepared dry mix lubricated by magnesium stearate (sifted through # 60 sieve) for 3 min. Lubricated granules were evaluated for flow properties and compressed into tablets.

 

Table 1: NL FORMULATION

Ingredient

Applications

Quantity

per tablet(mg)

Lamo

Drug

200

Lactose monohydrate

Diluent

33

Microcrystalline Cellulose

Diluent and binder

33

Crospovidone

Disintegrant

8

Magnesium Stearate

Lubricant

1

Total

 

275

 

6.      Effect of type and concentration of plasticizer on solubility and dissolution:

Lamo, polymer and plasticizer as in table 2 were mixed well and taken in porcelain dish. This dry mix was subjected to melt at 217 C using heating mantle (Lab Hosp. Corp., ELCON) with mixing to get clear molten mass.  Curing of molten mass was done by keeping it at room temperature for 12 hrs.

 

a.      Size Reduction of HME Flakes:

Solid dispersion prepared by HME was then passed through 3mm screen of hammer mill, milled granules were sifted through #40 sieve. Granules retained on #40 sieve then passed through 1mm screen of hammer mill, milled granules were sifted through #40 sieve. Obtained granules were mixed well for 5min.

b.      Lubrication of HME Granules:

HME granules were then lubricated by sodium stearyl fumarate and colloidal silicon dioxide (sifted through #60 sieve) for 5 min.  Lubricated granules were evaluated for flow properties and compressed into tablets. Compression parameters were recorded.


 

Table 2: HME FORMULATION

 

Applications

L1

L2

L3

L 4

L 5

L 6

L 7

L 8

L9

Dry mix for HME

 

mg/tab

mg/tab

mg/tab

mg/tab

mg/tab

mg/tab

mg/tab

mg/tab

mg/tab

Lamo

Drug

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

200

Kollidon VA64

Thermal binder

200

   200

   200

200

200

200

200

200

200

PEG 4000

Plasticizer

10*

-

-

20**

30#

-

-

-

-

Cremophor EL

Plasticizer

-

10*

-

-

-

20**

30#

-

-

Montane 20 PHA

Plasticizer

-

-

10*

-

-

-

-

20**

30#

HME Granules

 

410

410

410

420

430

420

430

420

430

Lubricants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colloidal Silicon Dioxide

Lubricant

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.3

1.3

Sodium Stearyl Fumarate

Lubricant

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.7

2.7

Total

 

       414

 414

414

424

434

424

434

424

434

*10% w/w of polymer (Kollidon VA 64); **20% w/w of polymer (Kollidon VA 64); #30% w/w of polymer (Kollidon VA 64)

 


c.       Characterization of HME Dry Mix ,HME Granules And NHME Dry Mix:

i.        DSC:

The drug, HME and NHME were subjected to DSC study using (Mettler TA 4000) DSC apparatus. First 5-10 mg of sample was weighed into aluminum crucible. These powders/granules were analyzed by heating at scanning rate of 100C / minute over a temperature range 50 to 2000 C with nitrogen flow of 50mL/min.

ii.   XRD:

The drug, HME complex and NHME formulated powder were subjected to XRD (using P.W. 1729, X-Ray Generator, Philips, Nether land). To study XRD pattern, the sample was placed into aluminum holder and the instrument was operated between initial and final 2θ angle of 5-500 respectively in an increment of 0.402θ.

iii. IR:

The drug, HME complex and NHME formulated powder were subjected to FTIR (8400s spectrophotometer Shimadzu) studies to check the characteristic sharp peaks of drug and its functional groups. The KBr disk method was used for preparation of sample.

Prepared tablets (table 2) of formulation F1 –F9 were subjected to solubility and dissolution study.

7.      In Vitro Permeability of HME and NHME Formulation:

The prepared tablets were subjected to In vitro permeability test using dialysis membrane LA401.

8.      Stability Studies:[13,16]

Stability studies of tablets were performed as per International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. The tablets from the optimized batch were subjected for stability study at 40ºC/75% RH for 3 months.

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

1.      Characterisation of Lamo:

A.     Description:

B.     It is a white, odorless crystalline powder. Hence confirms the description as per the certificate of analysis (COA).

C.     Saturation Solubility:

As per literature the solubility of Lamo in water is less than 380µg/mL. Experimentally it         was found to be 3.703952381µg/mL.

D.     Melting point:

Melting point by capillary method and instrumental method observed was 214C and 217C respectively. (as per the literature 217ºC)

E.     XRD:

Sharp peaks were observed from 5 to 30º of 2θ scale, which reveals the crystalline nature of drug.

F.      IR:

IR spectra reveal characteristic functional groups same as reference standard.

G.     DSC:

DSC studies show the peak value at 217C corresponds to standard melting point (217ºC).

All the characteristic test of pure drug confirms the purity of Lamo.

2.      Preparation of Standard Curve:

Lamo is soluble in dilute HCl 2mL, so this medium was used for preparation of standard curve. λ max, correlation coefficient R and calibration curve equation are as given below.

Using absorbance and concentration data Beer lamberts plot was prepared which is shown in figure 1 and table 3. Calibration curve equation has shown linear relationship and high degree of correlation in the range of 1-10 μg/mL at 288nm. This curve was utilized in Lamo estimation as and when required.

 

Table 3: CALIBRATION CURVE FOR LAMO (n=3)

Concentration (µg/mL)

Average Absorbance

1

0.0545±0.07

2

0.0889±0.19

3

0.1258±0.04

4

0.1558±0.03

5

0.189±0..22

6

0.2262±0.14

7

0.2579±0.59

8

0.2913±0.28

9

0.3289±0.16

10

0.3613±0.66

 

Figure 1: CALIBRATION CURVE FOR LAMO

 

3.      Determination of Drug :Polymer Ratio

Initially all the prepared films were transparent as in table 4. Appearance of these films even after storage at room temperature for 24hrs remained transparent except film of pure drug which on storage shows the recrystallization of drug. In all other ratios of drug: polymer (1:1 to 1:5). Lamo remain in solubilised state throughout the storage period as in figure 2. So 1:1 ratio was selected for further study as Lamo remains in solubilised state in this ratio.


 

Table 4:  OPTIMISATION OF DRUG: POLYMER RATIO

 

Sample

Solvent

Ratio

Solubility

Appearence

Appearance after 24 hrs

A

Drug

Ethanol

-

Clear solution

Clear, transparent

White clusters were seen

B

Polymer

Ethanol

-

Clear solution

Clear, transparent

Clear, transparent

C

Drug: Polymer(1:1)

Ethanol

1:1

Clear solution

Clear, transparent

Clear, transparent

D

Drug: Polymer(1:2)

Ethanol

1:2

Clear solution

Clear, transparent

Clear, transparent

E

Drug: Polymer(1:3)

Ethanol

1:3

Clear solution

Clear, transparent

Clear, transparent

F

Drug:Polymer(1:4)

Ethanol

1:4

Clear solution

Clear, transparent

Clear, transparent

G

Drug:Polymer(1:5)

Ethanol

1:5

Clear solution

Clear, transparent

Clear, transparent

 

Figure 2: APPEARANCE OF FILMS AFTER 24 hrs (AT ROOM  TEMPERATURE AND IN DESICATOR),  A: PURE DRUG, B: POLYMER, C: DRUG: POLYMER (1:1), D: DRUG: POLYMER (1:2),  E:DRUG: POLYMER  (1:3), F: DRUG: POLYMER (1:4), G: DRUG: POLYMER (1:5)

 

Figure 3: TEMPERATURE RANGE FOR EXTRUSION OF PURE POLYMERS

 


Table 5: EVALUATION OF LUBRICATED GRANULES AND TABLETS (n=3) ND

Parameters for granules

Observations

Bulk Density(g/mL)

0.55±0.022

Tapped density(g/mL)

0.64±0.012

Hausner’s Ratio

1.16±0.01

Carr’s Index (%)

14.06±0.07

Angle of repose ( )

25±0.034

Parameters for tablets

Observations

Machine

Lab Hosp

Punch

19 x 9.5,Capsule shape

Weight of tablet(mg)

210±0.011

Hardness(kg)

12-15±0.061

Disintegration Time(mins)

8±0.51

Friability (%)

0.3±0.801

 

4.      Effect of Temperature on Decomposition of Polymer

Extrudates of Kollidon VA64 look clear and glassy, with increasing temperature the colour turns yellowish and brownish. The actual discolouration of polymer was observed above 120C processing temperature. Above 200C melting temperature extrusion becomes difficult.

 

5.      Preparation of Non HME Formulation

Lubricated granules characterization and compression parameters are as given below in table 5.

 


 

Table 6: EVALUATION OF LUBRICATED GRANULES AND TABLETS (n=3) HME

Parameters for granules

Observations

 

L1

L2

L3

Bulk Density(g/mL)

0.52±0.15

0.512±0.11

0.501±0.033

Tapped density(g/mL)

0.67±0.04

0.64±0.001

0.63±0.019

Hausner’s Ratio

1.28±0.11

1.25±0.04

1.26±0.064

Carr’s Index (%)

22.38±0.021

20±0.061

20.48±0.27

Angle of repose()

27±0.01

26±0.023

28±0.022

Parameters for tablets

L1

L2

L3

Machine

Lab. Hosp.

Punch

19 x 9.5,Capsule shape

Weight of tablet(mg)

 mg

 mg

1264 mg

Hardness(kg)

12-15 kg±0.06

12-15 kg±0.09

12-15 kg±0.01

DT(min)

24mins±0.01

25mins±0.036

23mins±0.088

Friability(%)

0.3%±0.01

0.31%±0.08

0.36%±0.037

 

Figure 4I: DSC OF A) PURE DRUG B) NHME C) HME PEG D) HME  CHREMOPHOR E) HME MONTANE 20 PHA

 


6.      Effect of type and concentration of plasticizer on solubility and dissolution:

Glass transition temperature (Tg) (figure 3) of Kollidon VA64 is 101C, which may be reduced after addition of plastisizers. As a general rule, melt extrusion process should be run at temperature 20-40C above the Tg. Temperature range for melt extrusion of pure polymer is 155-200C where as for polymer plastisizer combination it is 120-200C.

 

In melt extrusion process drug can be either dissolved or dispersed in an amorphous or   crystalline state. To obtain thermodynamically stable formulation drug must get completely dissolved below its saturation solubility in the polymer which is known as solid solution .When the main objective of melt extrusion technology is enhancement of solubility, the processing temperature should be equivalent or slightly higher than melting point of drug to get solid solution system. Melting point of Lamo is approximately 217C (by DSC method), so the 200C temperature was selected for melt extrusion processing to get solid solution.

a.      Size Reduction  and

b.      Lubrication of Granules

c.       As compared to NHME granules, dense granules were obtained by HME process. Increased bulk and tapped density values confirmed the presence of dense granules. Hausner’s ratio, carr’s index and angle of repose values reveals the good flow characteristics of granules (table 6). Disintegration time of tablets prepared by HME technology was three times higher than those prepared by NHME technology (table 6). Disintegration pattern was bursting and erosion in tablets prepared by NHME and HME technology respectively.

 

c. Characterization of HME Dry Mix ,HME Granules And NHME Dry Mix

Absence of sharp peak was observed in DSC of HME granules as compared to DSC of pure drug. This indicates the presence of amorphous drug in molten carrier, but in case of NHME the sharp peak was observed indicating the crystalline nature of drug. DSC thermograms of Lamo in NHME and Lamo HME granules represented in the figure 4I. The DSC thermograms of pure Lamo shows sharp endotherm at 2170C attributed to the melting of Lamo. This sharp melting endotherm indicates the crystalline nature of drug. The DSC thermogram of NHME shows melting at 217 and 1810C of the drug and polymer respectively. The DSC thermogram of HME PEG, HME Chremophor and HME Montane 20PHA shows absence of characteristic melting endotherm of Lamo indicating the perfect miscibility of drug and polymer in the solid dispersion. As single Tg is characteristic of the thermoplastic system, the DSC thermogram of solid dispersion shows complete amorphization of drug.

 

The XRD pattern of pure drug, NHME, HME PEG, HME Chremophor and HME Montane PHA were recorded between 0-5°2θ scale and represented in the following figure 4II. The XRD pattern of pure drug shows several diffraction peaks indicating the crystalline nature of the drug. Peaks for crystallinity were observed in pure drug (Figure No. 4II a). The XRD pattern of NHME showed the presence of peaks with a significant decrease in intensity or absence of some major dap crystalline peaks (Figure No. 4II c). Generally this partial loss of crystallinity may be observed due to physical presence of amorphous excipients and their higher concentration. The drug was still in the crystalline state in this system. The XRD patterns of HME PEG, HME Sorbiton and HME montane 20 PHA showed complete absence of peaks of crystallinity as observed in pure Lamo indicated complete amorphization of Lamo in the melt. The presence of hump in all the samples indicates the amorphous nature of drug in the HME granules (Figure 4II c, d, e).

 

From the FTIR study Figure 4III it is clear that there is no interaction between drug PEG, drug chremophor, drug montane 20 PHA. All the peaks were responsible for active functional groups which were even present in HME granules of different types. In NHME similar peaks were observed as that of pure drug indicating no complex formation between drug and polymer

 

7.      Dissolution and saturation solubility

The disintegration time of tablets prepared by HME process was three times more than DT of NHME formulations. Comparatively, the Lamo HME tablet prepared by using 10%w/w concentration of montane 20 PHA shows more similarity than other formulations (Figure 5I).

 

Saturation solubility data (table 7) indicates that the hot melt process improved the solubility of Lamo by 4 times, 25 times and 74 times of its original solubility by using PEG 4000, Cremophor EL and Montane 20 PHA respectively. As compared to encouraging results of saturation solubility, dissolution data didn’t showed any noticeable discrimination in different plasticizers. So, it was decided to do the further study by using 20% w/w and 30%w/w concentrations of plasticizers. Increased concentration of plasticizers didn’t show any noticeable improvement in saturation solubility. A discriminative method to determine the dissolution enhancement by HME technique the in vitro permeability of formulations containing 10% plasticizer (using dialysis membrane in disso apparatus) was performed.

 


 

Figure 4II: XRD OF A) PURE DRUG B) NHME C) HME PEG D) HME CHREMOPHOR E) HME MONTANE 20 PHA

 

Figure 4III: FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED OF A) PURE DRUG B) NHME C) HME PEG D) HME CHREMOPHOR E) HME MONTANE PHA

 

Figure 5I: DISSOLUTION STUDIES OF VARIOUS FORMULATIONS WITH

 

Table 7: SATURATION SOLUBILITY OF FORMULATION (WITH 10% PLASTICIZER) IN WATER (n=3)

    Solubility

 

Plasticizer concentration

Pure Drug

(µg/mL)

Drug in 10%w/w aq. solution of polymer

(µg/mL)

Drug in Non HME

Dry Mix

(µg/mL)

Drug in HME granule with PEG 4000 (µg/ml)

Drug in HME granule with Chremophor EL (µg/mL)

Drug in HME granule with Montane 20PHA (µg/mL)

10%

7.15±

0.11

13.2±

0.14

10.09±

0.88

37.91±

0.30

31.66±

0.11

64.60±

0.02

20%

7.15±

0.13

13.2±

0.11

10.09±

0.75

39.41±

0.03

32.35±

0.73

67.06±

0.06

30%

7.15±

0.14

13.2±

0.55

10.09±

0.69

40±

0.11

34.71±

0.37

68.24±

0.05

 

Figure 6: PERMEABILTIY STUDIES

 

Table 8: STABILITY STUDIES (FORMULATIONS CONTAINING 10% PLASTICIZER) (n=3)

Formulation

L1

L2

L3

Storage Condition

400±20C/75%±5%RH

Storage Period

Initial

1M

2M

3M

Initial

1M

2M

3M

Initial

1M

2M

3M

Physical Appearance

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Moisture Content (%)

1.2±

0.12

1.3±

0.55

1.3±

0.33

1.3±

0.06

1.5±

0.02

2.0±

0.75

2.2±

0.05

2.8±

0.03

2.8±

0.31

2.9±

0.51

3.6±

0.024

3.7±

0.24

Drug Content (%)

99.2±

0.06

99.11±

0.01

98.97±

0.07

98.7±

0.017

99.00±

0.08

98.88±

0.28

98.12±

0.33

97.11±

0.85

98.2±

0.85

98.01±

0.50

97.99

±

0.32

97.12±

0.64

Dissolution (%) at 180min

95.02±

0.22

94.11±

0.89

93.93±

0.36

93.2±

0.09

93.57±

0.21

93.10±

0.01

92.90±

0.85

91.81±

0.36

94.17±

0.28

93.88±

0.01

93.2±

0.85

92.01±

0.92

 


8.      In vitro permeability of HME and NHME formulation

In vitro permeability study shows (Figure 6) that the Lamo HME tablets prepared by 10% Montane have highest permeability as compared to other Lamo HME tablets. NHME tablets shows lowest in vitro permeability compared to all Lamo HME formulations, even though have higher dissolution rate. Increase in, in vitro solubility and permeability may increase the in vivo solubility and permeability which leads to reduction in some fold of Lamo dose and cost of dosage form.

 

9.      Stability Study

Stability study (table 8) was carried out to determine the physical stability of the formulation carried out as per ICH guidelines at 400 C and 75 % RH for 1, 2 and 3 months. Various tests such as the drug content, moisture content and dissolution  were carried out at the end of 1, 2 and 3 months and compared with the day 0 results.

 

CONCLUSION:

Solubility of Lamo can be increased by HME technology which is one of the method of solid dispersion. The XRD pattern shows amorphous nature of Lamo in HME granules. The DSC thermogram of HME granules shows absence of characteristic melting endotherm of Lamo indicating the perfect miscibility of drug and polymer in the HME granules. Dissolution rate of Lamo HME tablets is not similar to that of NHME and marketed formulations, but the saturation solubility and in vitro permeability of Lamo HME formulations is higher than NHME and marketed formulations. In all HME formulations HME with Montane 20 PHA shows better enhancement in, in vitro permeability and saturation solubility. All optimized HME formulations shows good stability over the period of 3 month at 40 ± 20C/ 75%±5%RH.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

Authors are thankful to Emcure Pharma Ltd, Modern College of Pharmacy (For Ladies), Moshi and University of Pune for their support.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Lamotrigine, 84057-84-1CAS MSDS, Product Description. http://google.com

2.       Lamotrigine, drug bank, db00555, Lamotrigine. http:// google.com

3.       open notebook science,lamotrigine, http://google.com

4.       Lindenberg M, Kopp S, Dressman J. Classification of orally administered drugs on the World Health Organsation Model list of Essential Medicines according to the biopharmaceutical classification system. Europen Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 58; 2004: 265-278.

5.       Patel R, Dr Natvarlal M. Formulation Strategies for improving drug solubility using solid dispersions.  Pharmaceutical Technology. 7(6); 2009.

6.       Patel PS, Raval JP, Patel HV. Review on Pharmaceutical Applications of Hot Melt Exturder. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 3(2); 2010.

7.       Gavin PJ, David S, Osama AM, Daniel NM, Mark S. Hot Melt Extrusion: An Emerging Drug Delivery Technology. Pharmaceutical Technology Europe.  21(1); 2009:24-27.

8.        Leuner C, Dressman J. Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid solutions. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 5; 2000: 47-60.

9.        Ford JL. The current status of solid dispersions. Pharm. Acta Helv. 61; 1986: 69-88.

10.     Goldberg AH, Gibaldi M and Kanig JL. Increasing dissolution rates and gastrointestinal absorption of drugs via solid solutions and eutectic mixtures III Experimental evaluation of griseofulvin-succinic acid solution. J. Pharm. Sci. 55; 1966: 487-492.

11.     Doherty C, York PJ. Evidence for solid-and liquid-state interactions in a furosemide polyvinylpyrrolidone solid dispersion. Pharm. Sci. 76; 1987: 731-737.

12.     Sekiguchi K, Obi N. Studies on absorption of eutectic mixtures. Chem. Pharm. Bull.  9; 1961: 866- 872.

13.     Nozawa Y, Mizumoto T, Higashide F. Improving dissolution rate of practically insoluble drug kitasamycin by forcibly roll mixing with additives. Pharm. Ind. 8; 1986: 967-969.

14.     Hancok BC, Shamblin SL, Zografi G. Molecular mobility of amorphous pharmaceutical solids below their glass transition temperatures. Pharm. Res.12; 1995: 799-806.

15.     Yang M, Li J, Kathrin RJ, Gryczke A, Asgarzadeh F. A Systematic and predictive Approach for Formulation Development of Poorly Souble Drugs via Solid Dispersion, Evonik Degussa Corp, Pharma Polymers, USA

16.     K. Kolter, M. Karl, S. Nalawade, N. Rottmann, Hot-Melt Extrusion with BASF Pharma Polymers Extrusion Compendium, BASF The Chemical Company, October 2010.

17.     Suneela Prodduturi, Kevin L. Urman, Joshua U. Otaigbe and Michael A.Repka, Stabilisation of Hot-Melt Extrusion Formulations Containing Solid Solutions Using Polymer Blends, AAPS PharmSciTech. 8(2); 2007: E1-E10.

 

 

Received on 31.10.2013       Accepted on 01.12.2013     

© Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved

Asian J. Pharm. Res. 3(4): Oct. - Dec.2013; Page 172-180